Kuro5hin.org: technology and culture, from the trenches
create account | help/FAQ | contact | links | search | IRC | site news
[ Everything | Diaries | Technology | Culture | Freedom & Politics | Media | News | Internet | Op-Ed | Columns | Meta | MLP ]
We need your support: buy an ad | premium membership

[P]
Vote MP3! (MLP)

By senjiro
Sun Aug 4th, 2002 at 05:16:34 AM EST

Politics

The United Kingdom Electoral Commission has approved the registration of the MP3 Party, according to this Register article . No, you don't get to vote Metallica into office. The MP3 Party platform revolves around the concept that complex bureaucracies are incapable of functioning.

 


Despite the name, the party hopes to recruit non-geeks, as well as apathetic youth and generally anyone fed up with the current way of doing things. Party Leader Ruslan G. Fedorovsky (MD of http://www.audiobooksforfree.com/) told a reporter ""MP3 collectors aren't just people who want to listen to music for free, they are part of a community." Party slogan: Elect us and we will delete one regulation per day, one law per week, one subsidy per month and one tax per year. Here is a link to the official party site.

While this sounds a bit far-fetched, I would like to seem something analagous here in the US. For people like me, voting Democrat, Republican, or Independent just seems like a waste of time. The Brits continue to prove that their society is moving in the right direction. Will the MP3 party be anything more than a footnote in English politics? Will the US ever have a community based party?

< The Day The Earth Stood Still (48 comments)

Sponsors
Voxel dot net
o Managed Servers
o Managed Clusters
o Virtual Hosting

Promicro Systems
o Rackmount Servers
o Pedestal Servers
o High-Performance Clusters

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Related Links
o this Register article
o http://www.audiobooksforfree.com/
o Here
o prove
o More on Politics
o Also by senjiro


View: Display: Sort:
Vote MP3! | 40 comments (35 topical, 5 editorial, 0 pending)
I want to found my own political party (none / 0) (#38)
by Alan Crowe on Sun Aug 4th, 2002 at 10:09:25 AM EST
http://www.cawtech.freeserve.co.uk/index.html

In the UK elections I vote for the party that is softest on drugs. So last election I voted for Tommy Sheridan's Socialist Labour Party, even though I'm to the right of General Pinochet on some issues :-(

If I stood for election, atleast I would have someone to vote for :-)

Both "New and Improved Labour" and the "Radically Changed Conservative Party" are very flexible parties, dedicated to winning power. I see no hope of winning an election against them. But if I took votes off them, they would use focus groups to discover which of my policies were popular, and steal those policies. That is how they beat off the Greens. So a Useless Party, that always lost, could still change things, by forcing the mainstream parties to adopt policies that they wouldn't otherwise bother with. Worth a go?

My top three policies would be
  1. Unilateral Free Trade
  2. School Vouchers
  3. Changing the law on cannabis to be similar to that for alcohol
Yup, I'm seriously into unelectability. I cannot found my party at the moment because I cannot afford to lose an election deposit. One day, when I have spare money ...

 
troll troll on the wall (5.00 / 2) (#33)
by miasma on Sun Aug 4th, 2002 at 01:06:01 AM EST

you almost got me! I wrote a lengthy flame but suddenly...;)


--
IMHO, in case I forgot to mention above (I did, right?).
 
What the hell... (4.75 / 4) (#31)
by br284 on Sat Aug 3rd, 2002 at 06:46:00 PM EST
(net.aetherial@kuro5hin) http://aetherial.nu/

... is the following:

Commissioned philosopho-cybernetic research to the group of mathematicians of Voronezh University. This research will be the cornerstone of party Manifesto.

-Chris

 
Pendulum (none / 0) (#30)
by X-Nc on Sat Aug 3rd, 2002 at 06:20:10 PM EST
(tendotcn-xatdog) http://www.x-nc.net/

I don't know about this... It seems to be that everyone is going to far in one direction or the other. There's to much rule making now to make up for the lack of it before so now some want to swing the other way. Doesn't this all seem pointless? Why not use some common sense and a little cooperation?

I know, I know... I'm just dreaming again...

---
Now that K5 has a spell checker, no one will know it's me.
 
Bah (4.91 / 12) (#20)
by carbon on Sat Aug 3rd, 2002 at 02:06:32 AM EST
(davids@spam.me.not.argia.net) http://www.kamilkisiel.net/dreamtides/

Sounds great, but I'll only vote for em' when they're the 'Ogg Vorbis Party'.

"Torg, if you want to get your hand out of the jar, you have to let go of the candy corn" --Riff
"But candy corn rules!" --Torg

 
Definetly moving in the right direction! (4.00 / 4) (#16)
by delmoi on Fri Aug 2nd, 2002 at 09:18:48 PM EST
(delmoi(+)hatori42.com) http://hatori42.com/

If by 'right' you mean twards 1984

The great RUSTY commandith: vote -1 on stories you don't care about!
don't be foolish (4.91 / 12) (#10)
by demi on Fri Aug 2nd, 2002 at 07:46:04 PM EST
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~stewarmp/

For people like me, voting Democrat, Republican, or Independent just seems like a waste of time.

The problem with political representation in the US is that less than 50% of registered voters actually cast ballots, much less get involved with a political campaign or try to meet and speak with their elected representatives. Believe me, it is not beyond the means of a normal person with other responsibilities to do so. I've met all the way up to U.S. Senators before, and all it takes is the patience to sit through their speeches (when they give an address at a small public institution) and wait for them to take questions. I've never donated as much as a penny to a political campaign either (although I have been a volunteer on several occasions).

If every half-cocked "libertarian" or "green" registered and faithfully voted on-issue in every election, they would quickly become a major political force. Look at the NRA, State Teachers Associations, or FOP on opensecrets. Their donations don't come close to industry groups but they represent vital block votes.

VOTE, you morons, it actually works.

Party slogan: Elect us and we will delete one regulation per day, one law per week, one subsidy per month and one tax per year.

I doubt they will accomplish anything at all.

Sounds suspiciously like the Libertarian Party (4.50 / 4) (#9)
by leviramsey on Fri Aug 2nd, 2002 at 07:40:48 PM EST
http://levi.crystalorb.net/

in the US.

Remember, the two critical pillars of the LP (at least what they promote the most) are:
  1. Abolishing the federal income tax
  2. Drug legalization


I get the distinct impression that the MP3 party would not be opposed to doing either of these things (or their equivalents) in the UK.

I'm not a huge expert on UK politics, but how does the MP3 platform compare to the Liberal Democrats?
--
Charter member of the BSO188.44PNS.
Competition for MRL... (4.20 / 5) (#6)
by kaemaril on Fri Aug 2nd, 2002 at 07:26:22 PM EST
(k5@kaemaril.co.uk)

Well, finally! I see the official Monster Raving Loony party has some serious competition! Unfortunately, I can see any candidate these guys put up losing their deposit(s) pdq...


Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni!
 
Interesting idea (4.37 / 8) (#5)
by godix on Fri Aug 2nd, 2002 at 07:11:09 PM EST
(buggeroff@goaway.screwoff)

There's only so far they can take this, after awhile they'll run out of regulations, laws, subsidies, and taxes to repeal. Before that of course they'd run into the problem of 'Shall we break our promise, or go ahead and repeal the law prohibiting murder?' Obviously if the MP3 party got in they'd have to break their promises sooner or later.

A more realistic goal: Spend 6 months passing no new legislation, instead review current laws with an eye towards repealing them if needed. At 6 months 1 day pass a new law requiring all future legislation to be renewed once a decade. The things that should obviously illegal (murder, rape, etc) would be renewed with no controversy. The things that become laws because of special circumstances (copyright, anti-terrorism, etc) may very well get shot down in 10 years if the special circumstances no longer apply. There would be some problems if a treaty is signed today that requires a certain law (copyright for example) and 10 years later the law isn't renewed suddenly putting the country in violation of the treaty. New treaties could be written with this in mind, but there would be problems with currently existing treaties.

So they're Libertarians, then? (3.62 / 8) (#4)
by dr k on Fri Aug 2nd, 2002 at 06:46:22 PM EST
(kuro5hin@antimodal.com)

There's never a political compass around when you need one.


Destroy all trusted users! Rate 1 for every comment!
Vote MP3! | 40 comments (35 topical, 5 editorial, 0 pending)
View: Display: Sort:

kuro5hin.org

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. The Rest © 2000 - 2002 Kuro5hin.org Inc.
See our legalese page for copyright policies. Please also read our Privacy Policy.
Kuro5hin.org is powered by Free Software, including Apache, Perl, and Linux, The Scoop Engine that runs this site is freely available, under the terms of the GPL.
Need some help? Email help@kuro5hin.org.
b4ta
Registered at the post office as: "enough tools to kill a horse"

Powered by Scoop create account | help/FAQ | mission | links | search | IRC | K5 Store | YOU choose the stories! Syndication Supported by NewsIsFree